Differentiability
At a Glance
- Frequency: 3 sub-parts across 3 of 13 years (2016, 2019, 2025)
- Priority tier: T3
- Marks (count): 10 (2), 15 (1)
- Average solve time: ~9 min
- Difficulty mix: easy 3
- Section: A | Dominant type: proof
Why This Chapter Matters
Differentiability questions span two distinct archetypes — testing differentiability at a specific point using one-sided derivatives or first principles, and deriving a derivative from a functional equation. Both types appear in Section A or early Section B and carry 10–15 marks. The methods are clean and repeatable: master the first-principles difference-quotient argument and the squeeze theorem trick for oscillating functions, and you can handle every past variant. The functional-equation archetype also tests ODE fluency, giving it double value.
Minimum Theory
Differentiability. is differentiable at if exists. Equivalently, the left-hand derivative and right-hand derivative both exist and are equal. Differentiability implies continuity; the converse is false.
Key techniques. (i) First-principles at a corner/patch point: write and bound using (squeeze theorem). (ii) Piecewise absolute-value functions: remove separately for and (where the sign of the expression is determined), differentiate each branch, and compare the one-sided derivatives. (iii) Functional equations: write using the definition, apply the functional equation to factor out , and recognise the remaining limit as .
Differentiable extension. To extend to a differentiable , set for and choose and to make both continuity and the first-principles derivative work at . For the choice works; the formula is valid for but oscillates at — must be computed separately from the definition.
Question Archetypes
| Archetype | You are seeing this when… |
|---|---|
| differentiability-test | Test differentiability at a specific point using first-principles or one-sided derivatives |
| functional-equation-derivative | Derive from a multiplicative or additive functional equation |
differentiability-test (2 question(s); 2016, 2019)
Recognition Cues
- “Show there is a differentiable function extending ” — construct and verify the extension at the patch point.
- “Is differentiable at ? Prove your answer” — compute both one-sided derivatives.
- Function involves near , or an absolute value of a trigonometric expression at a zero.
Solution Template
- Identify the special point. Determine where differentiability might fail (patch point, zero of the inner function, etc.).
- Handle special point. Show differentiability away from the special point using the product/chain/sum rules.
- One-sided derivatives at the special point. Compute and separately, either via the relevant branch formula or directly from the limit definition.
- First-principles at the special point (if formulas diverge). Write explicitly; apply the squeeze theorem or algebra.
- Compare and conclude. If , is differentiable (state the value); if not, is not differentiable (state the one-sided values).
Worked Example
2016 Paper 2, 2016-P2-Q1b (10 marks)
For , , show that there is a differentiable function extending .
Step 1 — Define the extension. Set
On , . The choice is forced by continuity: .
Step 2 — Differentiability for . By the product and chain rules,
Step 3 — Differentiability at (first principles). Since the formula for oscillates as , we must use the definition:
Since , the squeeze theorem gives .
Conclusion. is differentiable at every (Step 2) and at (Step 3).
Remark. is not continuous at (the term oscillates), so . Differentiability does not require .
2019 Paper 1, 2019-P1-Q2a (15 marks)
Is differentiable at ? Prove your answer.
Step 1 — Resolve near . Near , so . But changes sign at :
Note .
Step 2 — Left-hand derivative.
Step 3 — Right-hand derivative.
(Via difference quotient with : ; with : .)
Step 4 — Conclusion. , so is not differentiable at .
Common Traps
- At for the extension: you cannot read from the formula — that formula has no limit at . Always return to the first-principles definition.
- For : the bound works because of the factor; the analogous extension of by is continuous but not differentiable at .
- Only causes a kink near — since there, is smooth. Students who differentiate incorrectly waste time.
- The function is continuous at (both branches give ). Continuity does not imply differentiability; you must check the one-sided derivatives.
- For the absolute-value type: get signs right. For , , so its derivative is , giving .
functional-equation-derivative (1 question(s); 2025)
Recognition Cues
- ” for all real ; is given; show ; find .”
- The functional equation is multiplicative (exponential type) or additive (linear type).
- “Hence find ” signals: prove the ODE, then solve it by separation of variables.
Solution Template
- Find . Set in the functional equation to determine .
- Derive from first principles. Write ; use the functional equation to factor out .
- Identify the remaining limit as . The factor .
- State the ODE .
- Solve the ODE by separation: , so ; apply to get .
Worked Example
2025 Paper 1, 2025-P1-Q1d (10 marks)
Given for all real ; ; . Show for all , and find .
Step 1 — Find . Set : , so . Since everywhere, , hence
Step 2 — Derive from first principles.
Step 3 — Identify the remaining limit.
Therefore
Step 4 — Solve the ODE. Separate variables: , so , giving . Apply : .
Common Traps
- First prove before writing — the comes from .
- The functional equation factor step: , not . The multiplicative structure is the key.
- Don’t use the derivative formula without the definition; the problem asks you to show , which requires the first-principles limit argument.
- After solving , apply the initial condition to pin down . Leaving unresolved loses marks.
Marks-Aware Writing
10-mark questions (2016, 2025): For the extension question — define explicitly, handle by rules (one line), then write out the first-principles computation at with the squeeze theorem step; box the conclusion. For the functional-equation question — the three steps (find , derive with the limit factored explicitly, solve the ODE) cover all marks. Omitting or skipping the first-principles limit loses 3–4 marks.
15-mark question (2019): Removing on both sides (Step 1) and computing , via the branch formulas each carry 4 marks; the conclusion (not differentiable, with both values stated) carries 3 marks. A student who writes only the branch formulas without checking the two-sided derivatives earns at most 8 marks.
Practice Set
- 2021-P1-Q1c (10 m) — — Hint: compare one-sided derivatives using first principles; the function is likely piecewise near the test point.