Frequency: 7 sub-parts across 6 of 13 years (2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2020, 2021)
Priority tier: T2
Marks (count): 10 (4), 15 (1), 5 (1), 8 (1)
Average solve time: ~6 min
Difficulty mix: medium 4, easy 3
Section: A | Dominant type: computation
Why This Chapter Matters
Integration trick questions appear in compulsory Q1 (Section A) and occasionally Q2/Q3. They are universally solvable — no new theorem is needed, just pattern recognition. Five archetypes account for every UPSC question on this atom. The hardest (King’s reflection, Beta/Gamma reduction) are worth 10 marks and take 5–8 minutes. Recognising the archetype at a glance is the single most valuable skill here: the wrong technique can consume 15 minutes without progress, while the correct one reaches the answer in 3.
Minimum Theory
The Fundamental Theorem (FTC) and its subtlety. If F′(x)=f(x) on (a,b] and F extends continuously to a, then ∫abf(x)dx=F(b)−F(a). The key subtlety: F′(a) need not exist (the antiderivative can be non-differentiable at a single point), yet FTC still holds. The improper-FTC version via limε→0∫a+εb is how such cases are handled rigorously.
King’s (reflection) property. For any integrable f and a≤b:
∫abf(x)dx=∫abf(a+b−x)dx.
Adding the two expressions and dividing by 2 gives a self-referential integral that collapses cleanly when f(x)+f(a+b−x) simplifies to a constant. This is the most versatile trick in UPSC integration questions.
Beta and Gamma functions.Γ(s)=∫0∞ts−1e−tdt (valid for s>0), with Γ(n)=(n−1)! for positive integers and Γ(1/2)=π. The master reduction: ∫01xm(−logx)ndx=(m+1)n+1Γ(n+1), obtained by the substitution x=e−t. The Beta function B(p,q)=∫01tp−1(1−t)q−1dt=Γ(p)Γ(q)/Γ(p+q), with the scaling ∫ab(x−a)m(b−x)ndx=(b−a)m+n+1B(m+1,n+1).
Question Archetypes
Archetype
Recognition cue
recognize-antiderivative
Integrand “looks like” a product-rule expansion d/dx[F]
symmetry-property
Symmetric or complementary limits; trig integrand where sin↔cos swap helps
beta-gamma-reduction
∫01xm(−logx)ndx or ∫ab(x−a)m(b−x)ndx form
integration-by-parts
Inverse-trig, log, or polynomial times transcendental; boundary term contributes
integral-functional-equation
An equation of the form ∫0xf=(…); differentiate to find f
recognize-antiderivative (1 question(s); 2013)
Recognise the integrand as an exact derivative and apply FTC
Recognition Cues
The integrand consists of two terms that look “mismatched” but together form the derivative of a product. Look for structures like u′v+uv′ (product rule) or dxd[uv] after grouping. A telltale sign: direct integration of each piece is intractable, but their sum is immediately an exact derivative.
Solution Template
Stare at the two additive terms and ask: could this be (fg)′=f′g+fg′ for some f,g?
Identify f and g; verify by differentiating fg.
Extend fg continuously to the endpoint if needed.
Apply FTC (possibly as a limit ε→0).
Worked Example
2013 Paper 1, 2013-P1-Q1c (10 marks)
Evaluate ∫01(2xsinx1−cosx1)dx.
Step 1 — Spot the antiderivative. For x>0:
dxd[x2sinx1]=2xsinx1+x2cosx1⋅(−x21)=2xsinx1−cosx1.
The integrand is exactly F′(x) with F(x)=x2sin(1/x).
Step 2 — Handle x=0. Set F(0)=0; then ∣F(x)∣≤x2→0, so F is continuous at 0. The integrand is bounded (with an essential discontinuity at 0, hence Riemann integrable).
Step 3 — Apply FTC via limit:∫01=limε→0∫ε1=F(1)−F(ε)=sin1−ε2sin(1/ε)→sin1.∫01(2xsinx1−cosx1)dx=sin1.
Common Traps
Trying to integrate 2xsin(1/x) and cos(1/x) separately — neither has an elementary antiderivative alone. They are engineered to give a clean primitive only in combination.
The antiderivative F is continuous at 0 (bounded by x2) but not differentiable there (cos(1/x) has no limit). FTC applies on [ε,1]; the limit as ε→0 is justified by continuity of F, not differentiability.
symmetry-property (2 question(s); 2014, 2015)
Use a reflection/King property of definite integrals
Recognition Cues
The integral has limits [a,b] symmetric about some midpoint, and f(x)+f(a+b−x) simplifies to a constant. Canonical form: ∫π/6π/3 (midpoint π/4, where sin↔cos) or ∫01 (midpoint 1/2). Trig functions with complementary arguments, logarithms, and cube roots of trig ratios all signal this archetype.
Solution Template
Call the integral I.
Substitute x→a+b−x (limits stay [a,b]; dx→−dx with a sign flip from reversing limits). Call the result I again (same value).
Add the two expressions for I; the integrand simplifies (often to a constant or constant times a simpler function).
Divide by 2.
Worked Example 1
2015 Paper 1, 2015-P1-Q1d (10 marks)
Evaluate I=∫π/6π/33sinx+3cosx3sinxdx.
The limits are symmetric about π/4 (since π/6+π/3=π/2). Substitute x→π/2−x; then sinx↔cosx:
I=∫π/6π/33cosx+3sinx3cosxdx.
Add:
2I=∫π/6π/33sinx+3cosx3sinx+3cosxdx=∫π/6π/31dx=3π−6π=6π.I=12π.
Note: the cube-root is a red herring — any g(sinx)/[g(sinx)+g(cosx)] yields I=(interval length)/2.
Worked Example 2
2014 Paper 1, 2014-P1-Q1d (10 marks)
Evaluate ∫011+x2log(1+x)dx.
Substitute x=tanθ: the integral becomes I=∫0π/4log(1+tanθ)dθ.
Apply King with a+b−θ=π/4−θ; use tan(π/4−θ)=(1−tanθ)/(1+tanθ):
1+tan(π/4−θ)=1+tanθ2,log(⋅)=log2−log(1+tanθ).
Then I=∫0π/4[log2−log(1+tanθ)]dθ=4πlog2−I, giving:
I=8πlog2.
The key: the upper limit is π/4 precisely because tan(π/4)=1 makes the symmetry work.
Common Traps
The reflection trick requires the sum of limits to give the argument that creates the symmetry (π/6+π/3=π/2 gives sin↔cos; for ∫0π/4 with tan, the key is π/4 as the “fixed point” of x→π/4−x). The trick fails for asymmetric limits.
The integrand may look complicated, but after applying King, the whole function often cancels, leaving a simple integrand.
beta-gamma-reduction (2 question(s); 2016, 2021)
Reduce an integral to a Beta/Gamma function via substitution
Recognition Cues
The integrand contains xm(−logx)n on [0,1], or (x−a)m(b−x)n on [a,b], or a product of two power functions on an interval. The substitution x=e−t converts the first type to a Gamma integral; linear rescaling converts the second to a Beta integral.
For ∫ab(x−a)m(b−x)ndx: substitute x=a+(b−a)t, t∈[0,1]:
=(b−a)m+n+1∫01tm(1−t)ndt=(b−a)m+n+1B(m+1,n+1).
Worked Example 1
2016 Paper 1, 2016-P1-Q1c (10 marks)
Evaluate I=∫013xlog(x1)dx.
Rewrite: I=∫01x1/3(−logx)1/3dx (since log(1/x)=−logx≥0 on (0,1)).
Substitute x=e−t:
I=∫0∞e−t/3⋅t1/3⋅e−tdt=∫0∞t1/3e−4t/3dt.
Using ∫0∞ts−1e−ptdt=Γ(s)/ps with s=4/3 and p=4/3:
I=(4/3)4/3Γ(4/3)=(43)4/3Γ(34)≈0.608.I=(43)4/3Γ(34).
The most common error: forgetting the (4/3)4/3 denominator (writing Γ(4/3) alone is wrong because the formula is Γ(s)/ps, not Γ(s)).
Worked Example 2
2021 Paper 1, 2021-P1-Q3a-iii (8 marks)
Express ∫ab(x−a)m(b−x)ndx in terms of the Beta function.
Substitute x=a+(b−a)t, dx=(b−a)dt. Then x−a=(b−a)t and b−x=(b−a)(1−t):
∫ab=(b−a)mtm⋅(b−a)n(1−t)n⋅(b−a)dtt∈[0,1]=(b−a)m+n+1∫01tm(1−t)ndt.∫ab(x−a)m(b−x)ndx=(b−a)m+n+1B(m+1,n+1).
Special case a=0,b=1: recovers the standard Beta integral B(m+1,n+1) directly.
Common Traps
Beta uses p−1,q−1 as exponents. So tm→p−1=m, i.e. p=m+1. Students who write B(m,n) instead of B(m+1,n+1) lose the answer.
Count the (b−a) powers. The factor (b−a)m+n+1 accumulates as: m from (x−a)m, n from (b−x)n, and 1 from dx.
integration-by-parts (1 question(s); 2020)
Evaluate a definite integral using integration by parts
Recognition Cues
The integrand contains an inverse-trig function (e.g., arctan) or logarithm that resists direct integration. Integration by parts with u= the transcendental and dv=dx (so v=x) is the standard entry. The boundary term at the singular endpoint may be a 0⋅(finite) limit.
Solution Template
Set u= (transcendental), dv=dx, compute v=x and du.
I=[xu]ab−∫abxdu; evaluate boundary terms with limits.
Reduce ∫xdu to a standard form (partial fractions, completing the square, arctan integral).
Worked Example
2020 Paper 1, 2020-P1-Q2a (15 marks)
Evaluate ∫01tan−1(1−x1)dx.
IBP:u=arctan(1−x1), dv=dx, v=x:
du=1+(1−1/x)21⋅x21dx=2x2−2x+1dx.
Boundary terms: at x=1: arctan(0)=0; at x→0+: arctan(−∞)=−π/2, so product →0.
I=0−∫012x2−2x+1xdx.
Split x=41(4x−2)+21 to expose the logarithm-derivative and arctan parts:
The integral is negative because 1−1/x<0 for x∈(0,1), so the arctan is negative throughout.
Common Traps
Boundary term at x=0. It is 0⋅(−π/2)=0 — a 0⋅finite limit, not indeterminate. Treating it as 0/0 or ∞⋅0 without checking that x→0 and arctan→−π/2 (finite) causes unnecessary alarm.
Sign of the final answer. The IBP produces I=−J, so I=−π/4, not +π/4.
Differentiate an integral identity to recover f(x)
Recognition Cues
The question gives an equation of the form ∫0xf(t)dt=(expression in x) and asks for f at a point (usually f(1)). The trick is immediate: differentiate both sides w.r.t. x using FTC.
Solution Template
Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x: LHS becomes f(x) (FTC); RHS becomes the derivative of the expression.
Solve for f(x) pointwise (often from f(x)(1+h(x))=1 or similar).
Evaluate at the requested x.
Worked Example
2021 Paper 1, 2021-P1-Q3a-ii (5 marks)
If ∫0xf(t)dt=x+∫x1tf(t)dt, find f(1).
Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x:f(x)=1−xf(x).
(LHS: FTC gives f(x). RHS: d/dx[∫x1tf(t)dt]=−xf(x) — FTC with x as the lower limit gives a minus sign.)
Solve:f(x)(1+x)=1⇒f(x)=1+x1.f(1)=21.
Common Traps
Sign of the lower-limit FTC.dxd∫x1g(t)dt=−g(x), not +g(x). Getting a + here gives f(x)=1+xf(x), which has no real solution for positive x.
The full identity may be inconsistent. The differentiated relation gives f pointwise; checking whether the original integral identity holds globally with this f may fail (as verified in the source solution). UPSC expects only f(1), which the differentiated form uniquely determines.
Marks-Aware Writing
For a 10-mark Q1 integral: Identify the archetype in the first 30 seconds. State the technique (e.g., “King’s property with x→π/2−x”), show the key algebraic step that makes both expressions add to something simple, then write the answer. All three parts earn marks; a bare answer earns at most 3.
For a 15-mark integral (Q2/Q3): Expect two or three distinct stages (e.g., IBP followed by partial fractions). Lay out each stage with a label and sub-result. Boundary terms at singular endpoints need a limit argument, not just substitution.
Naming the technique (“substituting x=e−t,” “using the reflection x→a+b−x,” “differentiating both sides”) signals to the examiner that you understand what you are doing — this is worth 1–2 marks beyond the computation.
Practice Set
2015-P1-Q4a (13 m) — — integrate a rational+trig combination; look for partial fractions
2022-P1-Q1d (10 m) — — symmetry property; identify the midpoint carefully
2018-P1-Q4b (12 m) — — Beta/Gamma reduction with a non-standard power
We've mapped all 13 years of this exam. Get new chapters, tools, and solutions as we release them — free.