Mean-value theorems (Rolle, Lagrange, Cauchy)
At a Glance
- Frequency: 3 sub-parts across 3 of 13 years (2014, 2021, 2025)
- Priority tier: T3
- Marks (count): 10 (2), 15 (1)
- Average solve time: ~9 min
- Difficulty mix: medium 2, easy 1
- Section: A | Dominant type: proof
Why This Chapter Matters
Mean-value theorem questions are among the most proof-heavy items in Section A, offering 10–15 marks for a clean three- or four-step argument. Two recurring patterns cover every past question: using Rolle’s theorem on a cleverly crafted auxiliary function to locate roots of a related equation, and using Lagrange’s MVT to sandwich a specific value between computable bounds. Both patterns reduce to the same structure — choose the right function, verify the hypotheses, invoke the theorem, translate back. Mastering the auxiliary-function trick (multiply by to shift from to ) and the derivative-bounding strategy for MVT inequalities covers every question in the corpus.
Minimum Theory
Rolle’s Theorem. If is continuous on , differentiable on , and , then there exists with .
Lagrange’s Mean Value Theorem (MVT). If is continuous on and differentiable on , then there exists with
Rearranged: . To prove an inequality , bound between its minimum and maximum on using monotonicity.
Cauchy’s MVT. If are continuous on , differentiable on , and on , then there exists with . (L’Hôpital’s rule is an application.)
Question Archetypes
| Archetype | You are seeing this when… |
|---|---|
| rolle-root-location | ”Between any two roots of , prove a root of exists” |
| mvt-inequality | ”Using the MVT, prove ” where are explicit numbers |
rolle-root-location (2 question(s); 2014, 2021)
Recognition Cues
- “Between two real roots of [equation involving ], a root of [equation involving ] lies.”
- The two equations are related by differentiation after an appropriate auxiliary transform.
- Both equations have the form "": the multiplier reduces them to clean trig-plus-exponential expressions.
Solution Template
- Choose auxiliary function . Multiply the original equation’s LHS by (or take , etc.) so that at the two given roots.
- Verify Rolle’s hypotheses. is continuous on and differentiable on (standard for elementary functions).
- Apply Rolle’s theorem. Conclude with .
- Compute and translate. Show that is equivalent to the target equation evaluated at .
- Conclude. is a root of the target equation lying strictly between the two given roots.
Worked Example
2014 Paper 1, 2014-P1-Q1c (10 marks)
Prove that between two real roots of , a real root of lies.
Step 1 — Define auxiliary function. Let be roots of . Define
Since , , so .
Step 2 — Rolle’s hypotheses. is on ; in particular continuous on and differentiable on .
Step 3 — Apply Rolle’s theorem. There exists with .
Step 4 — Compute and translate.
So gives , i.e.\ , i.e.\ .
Conclusion. is a root of .
2021 Paper 1, 2021-P1-Q1d (10 marks)
Show that between any two roots of , there exists at least one root of .
Step 1 — Auxiliary function. Let be roots of . Rewrite: , equivalently at both and .
Step 2 — Rolle’s hypotheses. is ; .
Step 3 — Apply Rolle. with .
Step 4 — Translate. , so , i.e.\ .
Common Traps
- Wrong auxiliary function: applying Rolle directly to gives , i.e.\ — not the desired conclusion. The trick is to multiply by first so that differentiating produces the needed term alongside .
- For 2021: the auxiliary is (not ); , which vanishes where .
- Rolle requires — verify this step explicitly; don’t just assert it.
- After applying Rolle, always compute explicitly before translating, to make the equivalence visible to the examiner.
mvt-inequality (1 question(s); 2025)
Recognition Cues
- “Using the Mean Value Theorem, prove ” where is a standard function and is a specific value.
- The function is , , , or similar; the interval has a known value and a derivative that can be bounded on .
- The bounds and are obtained by evaluating at the endpoints of the interval (monotone derivative argument).
Solution Template
- Choose and interval . Pick where is known; the value to bound is .
- Apply MVT. Write for some .
- Bound . Use monotonicity of on : (if increasing), so .
- Add throughout. Obtain .
- Simplify each bound to the stated numerical values.
Worked Example
2025 Paper 1, 2025-P1-Q2b (15 marks)
Using the Mean Value Theorem, prove .
Step 1 — Choose and interval. Let , continuous on and differentiable on , with .
Note , and .
Step 2 — Apply MVT. There exists with
Step 3 — Bound . Since is strictly increasing and ,
So .
Step 4 — Multiply by and add .
Step 5 — Simplify.
Common Traps
- Verify that is monotone on before bounding by endpoint values; if is not monotone, the endpoint bound fails.
- gives the lower bound (since is increasing, means ). Students who confuse which endpoint gives which bound invert the inequality.
- Simplify by rationalising: .
- State the MVT explicitly (“by Lagrange’s MVT, such that …”) — don’t just write the equation without naming the theorem.
Marks-Aware Writing
10-mark questions (2014, 2021): The three-step structure — define auxiliary function (identifying it correctly earns 4 marks), verify hypotheses briefly, apply Rolle and translate — covers all marks. Missing the step where is translated back into the target equation loses 3 marks. An answer that applies Rolle to the wrong function earns at most 2 marks.
15-mark question (2025): Step 1 (choose the right interval and recognise ) is worth 3 marks; the MVT application in Step 2 is worth 4 marks; bounding by endpoint values (Step 3) is worth 5 marks; simplifying to the stated closed-form bounds (Step 5) is worth 3 marks. An answer that invokes the MVT but fails to bound the derivative earns 7 marks.
Practice Set
(No additional practice items in the corpus beyond the three worked examples.)