Hermitian and skew-Hermitian matrices
At a Glance
- Frequency: 3 sub-parts across 2 of 13 years (2013, 2016)
- Priority tier: T3
- Marks (count): 10 (1), 8 (2)
- Average solve time: ~6 min
- Difficulty mix: medium 2, easy 1
- Section: A | Dominant type: proof
Why This Chapter Matters
Hermitian matrix questions are short proof items (8–10 marks) that test a small number of standard arguments. Three proofs cover every past question: the “sandwich” argument that Hermitian eigenvalues are real, the cyclic trace identity that gives , and the orthogonality-implies-independence chain for distinct-eigenvalue eigenvectors. All three can be written in under 8 minutes once the structure is internalised. These also appear as stepping stones inside larger eigenvalue and diagonalisation problems.
Minimum Theory
Definitions. The conjugate transpose of a matrix is (complex conjugate of each entry, then transpose). A square matrix is Hermitian if ; skew-Hermitian if .
Key properties. (i) and are both Hermitian for any , since . (ii) Hermitian matrices have real eigenvalues; skew-Hermitian matrices have purely imaginary (or zero) eigenvalues. (iii) The inner product satisfies — this identity drives the eigenvalue-reality proof.
Trace identity. . The quick proof: expand and sum over ; the result is , symmetric in swapping .
Orthogonality of eigenvectors. For a Hermitian matrix with distinct eigenvalues , the corresponding eigenvectors satisfy . Proof: (using and real eigenvalues), so .
Question Archetypes
| Archetype | You are seeing this when… |
|---|---|
| hermitian-real-eigenvalues | Prove eigenvalues of , , or a Hermitian matrix are real; show trace identity |
| hermitian-eigenvector-independence | Show eigenvectors for distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal, hence the eigenvector matrix is non-singular |
hermitian-real-eigenvalues (2 question(s); 2013, 2016)
Recognition Cues
- “Show the eigenvalues of (or , or a Hermitian matrix ) are real.”
- “Show .”
- The word “adjoint” in UPSC Linear Algebra means conjugate transpose , not the adjugate matrix.
Solution Template
- Show the matrix is Hermitian. For : compute . For a given : use .
- Sandwich argument. Let be an eigenvalue, , . Form :
- From the left: .
- From the Hermitian property: , so is real.
- Cancel . Conclude .
- For the trace identity. Expand ; sum over . Then expand ; sum over . Both equal .
Worked Example
2013 Paper 1, 2013-P1-Q1b (10 marks)
Let be a square matrix with conjugate transpose . Show the eigenvalues of and are real, and show .
Step 1 — Both matrices are Hermitian.
, so is Hermitian. Similarly , so is Hermitian.
Step 2 — Hermitian matrices have real eigenvalues. Let be Hermitian () with eigenvalue and eigenvector . Pre-multiply by :
Take the conjugate transpose of the scalar :
So equals its own conjugate, hence is real. Since , (1) gives .
Applying this to and completes the first part.
Step 3 — Trace identity.
2016 Paper 1, 2016-P1-Q2b-ii (8 marks)
Prove that eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix are all real.
Step 1 — Setup. Let . Let , .
Step 2 — Sandwich. Pre-multiply by :
Step 3 — Hermitian forces to be real. Since is , it equals its own conjugate transpose:
So is real; its conjugate equals itself.
Step 4 — Conclude . Taking the conjugate of : . Since is real, , giving . As :
Common Traps
- “Adjoint” in UPSC means conjugate transpose , not the adjugate (matrix of cofactors). If you use the wrong definition, the entire argument collapses.
- In the sandwich: write , not . Over , the plain transpose gives a bilinear form, not the Hermitian inner product, and need not be real.
- Must explicitly state (eigenvector is nonzero) before cancelling.
- Skew-Hermitian () gives purely imaginary eigenvalues (the same argument gives , i.e.\ ). Do not confuse the two cases.
hermitian-eigenvector-independence (1 question(s); 2013)
Recognition Cues
- “Hermitian matrix with distinct eigenvalues ; show the eigenvector matrix is non-singular.”
- The proof uses: orthogonality independence full rank non-singular.
Solution Template
- Prove pairwise orthogonality. For : compute two ways (eigenvalue of ; Hermitian move to giving eigenvalue of ). Get ; since , conclude .
- Prove linear independence. Suppose . Inner-product with : all cross terms vanish (Step 1), leaving , so .
- Conclude non-singularity. Columns of are linearly independent, so , so .
Worked Example
2013 Paper 1, 2013-P1-Q2c-i (8 marks)
Let be Hermitian with distinct eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors . Let be the matrix with -th column . Show is non-singular.
Step 1 — Orthogonality. Take . Compute two ways:
Way 1: , so .
Way 2: using : .
Since eigenvalues of are real (Hermitian), . Equating:
As , we get .
Step 2 — Linear independence. Suppose . Take inner product with :
since for (Step 1). As , we get for each .
Step 3 — Non-singularity. The columns of are linearly independent, so has rank , so , i.e.\ is non-singular.
Common Traps
- The hypothesis distinct eigenvalues is essential. Without it, eigenvectors for the same eigenvalue need not be orthogonal (though they can be made so by Gram-Schmidt). Always invoke distinctness explicitly.
- The inner product in Way 2 is , not . The conjugate arises from the second slot. Then use real eigenvalues to drop the bar.
- In Step 2, after inner-producting with , all cross terms vanish by Step 1, leaving only the term. Write this out explicitly.
Marks-Aware Writing
8-mark questions (2013-Q2c-i, 2016-Q2b-ii): Each step (orthogonality, or sandwich argument) should be one clear paragraph with the inner-product computation written out in full. An answer that states “Hermitian matrices have real eigenvalues” without proof earns 0 marks for that part. For the eigenvector independence question: Steps 1, 2, and 3 carry roughly 4 + 2 + 2 marks. Missing Step 2 (the linear independence argument) and jumping directly to “non-singular” loses 2 marks.
10-mark question (2013-Q1b): Part 1 (real eigenvalues) and Part 2 (trace identity) each carry 5 marks. For the trace identity: the computation is 4 marks; citing the Frobenius norm interpretation (optional) adds context but is not required for full marks.
Practice Set
- 2013-P1-Q2b-i (8 m) — — Hint: show every square matrix can be written as where is Hermitian and is skew-Hermitian; verify directly.
- 2021-P1-Q4a-ii (10 m) — — Hint: the same sandwich argument applies; check whether the given matrix satisfies .