Frequency: 3 sub-parts across 3 of 13 years (2014, 2019, 2020)
Priority tier: T3
Marks (count): 15 (1), 20 (1), 7 (1)
Average solve time: ~9 min
Difficulty mix: medium 2, easy 1
Section: A | Dominant type: proof
Why This Chapter Matters
Orthogonal and unitary matrices appear roughly once every four years in Paper 1, always as a proof-type question. The 2020 Householder reflector question is the most marks-dense item in this topic (20 marks, four sub-parts) and rewards anyone who knows the two key identities cold: uTu=1 (inner product) and uuTuuT=uuT (rank-1 collapse). The 2019 singularity question is a one-trick proof using the determinant factorisation A+B=A(A+B)TB; once you see it, it takes under five minutes. The 2014 unitary eigenvalue proof is a three-line argument that examiners accept at 7 marks — easiest possible full-marks return.
Minimum Theory
Orthogonal matrices. A real matrix A is orthogonal if AAT=ATA=I. Equivalently, its columns (and rows) form an orthonormal set. For any orthogonal A: detA=±1, A−1=AT, and A preserves Euclidean norms: ∥Av∥=∥v∥.
Unitary matrices. A complex matrix U is unitary if UU∗=U∗U=I, where U∗=UT is the conjugate transpose. Unitary matrices preserve the standard inner product: ⟨Uu,Uv⟩=⟨u,v⟩. Every unitary eigenvalue satisfies ∣λ∣=1. Real unitary matrices are exactly orthogonal matrices.
Householder reflector. For a real unit column vector u (so uTu=1), the matrix H=I−2uuT is symmetric (HT=H), orthogonal (HTH=I), and an involution (H2=I). Its trace is n−2, because tr(uuT)=uTu=1. The key simplification throughout: uuT⋅uuT=u(uTu)uT=uuT.
Explicit matrix: Compute uuT as outer product, multiply by 2, subtract from I.
Worked Example
2020 Paper 1, 2020-P1-Q2b (20 marks)
Define an n×n matrix as A=I−2u⋅uT, where u is a unit column vector. (i) Examine if A is symmetric. (ii) Examine if A is orthogonal. (iii) Show that trace(A)=n−2. (iv) Find A3×3, when u=(1/3,2/3,2/3)T.
Step 1 — Setup.u is a real unit column vector, so uTu=∥u∥2=1. Note uuT is an n×n rank-1 matrix; uTu=1 is a scalar.
Step 2 — Symmetry (part i).
AT=(I−2uuT)T=IT−2(uuT)T=I−2(uT)TuT=I−2uuT=A.
A is symmetric.
Step 3 — Orthogonality (part ii). Since AT=A, we need A2=I.
(I−2uuT)2=I−2uuT−2uuT+4uuTuuT.
The last term: uuT⋅uuT=u(uTu)uT=u(1)uT=uuT. Therefore:
A2=I−4uuT+4uuT=I.
ATA=A2=I, so A is orthogonal (and A−1=A).
Step 4 — Trace (part iii). By linearity of trace and the cyclic property tr(uuT)=tr(uTu)=uTu=1:
The inner product uTu (a scalar, equals 1) is not the same as the outer product uuT (an n×n matrix). Confusing the two destroys the simplification uuTuuT=uuT.
In part (ii), the cleanest path is to show A2=I (using AT=A from part i), not to compute ATA from scratch.
For the trace, the cyclic property gives tr(AB)=tr(BA), so tr(uuT)=tr(uTu)=1. Alternatively sum the diagonal entries of uuT directly.
In part (iv), the (2,3) and (3,2) entries are −8/9, not −4/9. The factor of 2 from 2uuT doubles the 4/9 from the outer product.
Two orthogonal matrices A,B of the same order with detA+detB=0.
Asked to prove A+B is singular.
The key insight: determinants of orthogonal matrices are ±1, so detA+detB=0 forces detA⋅detB=−1.
Solution Template
Argue about determinants. Since A,B are orthogonal, detA,detB∈{+1,−1}. The condition detA+detB=0 forces them to be opposite: detA=−detB, so detA⋅detB=−1.
Establish the factorisation. Show A+B=A(A+B)TB using AAT=I and BTB=I.
Take determinants of both sides. Use det(MT)=detM to get det(A+B)=detA⋅det(A+B)⋅detB.
Conclude. Substituting detA⋅detB=−1: det(A+B)=−det(A+B), so det(A+B)=0.
Worked Example
2019 Paper 1, 2019-P1-Q2b (15 marks)
Let A and B be two orthogonal matrices of same order and detA+detB=0. Show that A+B is a singular matrix.
Step 1 — Determinants of orthogonal matrices. Since AAT=BBT=I, taking determinants: (detA)2=(detB)2=1, so detA,detB∈{+1,−1}. The hypothesis detA+detB=0 forces:
detA=−detB,hencedetA⋅detB=−1.
Step 2 — The key factorisation. Claim: A+B=A(A+B)TB.
Verify: expand the right side using BTB=I and AAT=I:
Do not assume A and B are 2×2; the proof must work for any n×n orthogonal matrices. A specific example confirms the result but does not constitute a proof.
The condition detA+detB=0 with both values in {+1,−1} forces one to be +1 and the other −1. They cannot both be 0 (orthogonal determinants are never 0).
The factorisation A+B=A(A+B)TB is the non-obvious step. Verify it by expanding; students who skip this verification and just write “taking determinants” lose the key marks.
Do not confuse AT(A+B)BT with A(A+B)TB; the latter is what gives det(A+B) on the left with coefficient detA⋅detB.
unitary-eigenvalue-modulus (1 question(s); 2014)
Recognition Cues
Unitary matrix U (satisfying U∗U=I, U∗ = conjugate transpose).
Asked to prove every eigenvalue has modulus 1.
Sometimes phrased as: “eigenvalues lie on the unit circle in C.”
Solution Template
Setup. Let λ be an eigenvalue with eigenvector v=0: Uv=λv.
Compute ∥Uv∥2 two ways. Via unitary property: ∥Uv∥2=⟨Uv,Uv⟩=⟨v,U∗Uv⟩=⟨v,v⟩=∥v∥2. Via eigenvalue: ∥Uv∥2=∥λv∥2=∣λ∣2∥v∥2.
Equate and divide.∣λ∣2∥v∥2=∥v∥2, and ∥v∥2>0, so ∣λ∣2=1, giving ∣λ∣=1.
Worked Example
2014 Paper 1, 2014-P1-Q3c-ii (7 marks)
Prove that the eigenvalues of a unitary matrix have absolute value 1.
Let U be an n×n unitary matrix, so U∗U=I. Let λ∈C be an eigenvalue with eigenvector v=0, so Uv=λv.
Step 1 — Compute ∥Uv∥2 via the unitary property.
∥Uv∥2=⟨Uv,Uv⟩=⟨v,U∗Uv⟩=⟨v,Iv⟩=⟨v,v⟩=∥v∥2.
Step 2 — Compute ∥Uv∥2 via the eigenvalue equation.
∥Uv∥2=∥λv∥2=⟨λv,λv⟩=λλ⟨v,v⟩=∣λ∣2∥v∥2.
Step 3 — Equate and conclude.
∣λ∣2∥v∥2=∥v∥2.
Since v=0, we have ∥v∥2>0. Dividing:
∣λ∣2=1⟹∣λ∣=1.
Every eigenvalue of a unitary matrix has absolute value 1.■
Common Traps
The inner product step ⟨Uv,Uv⟩=⟨v,U∗Uv⟩ uses the sesquilinearity of the inner product (conjugate-linear in the first argument in the physics convention, or the second in the math convention — be consistent). The conclusion is the same.
The key identity is ∣λ∣2=λλ. Students who only write ∣λ∥ without connecting it to the eigenvalue equation may not get full credit.
The result extends to real orthogonal matrices: since the only real numbers with ∣λ∣=1 are ±1, eigenvalues of a real orthogonal matrix are in {+1,−1,eiθ,e−iθ}, with complex ones appearing in conjugate pairs.
Marks-Aware Writing
7-mark question (unitary eigenvalue, 2014): The three-step argument (unitary property → ∥Uv∥2=∥v∥2; eigenvalue equation → ∥Uv∥2=∣λ∣2∥v∥2; equate + divide) is exactly what the marking scheme expects. State U∗U=I explicitly and write both computations of ∥Uv∥2 before equating.
15-mark question (singularity, 2019): Two marks-bearing sub-arguments — (a) deducing detA⋅detB=−1 from the hypothesis, and (b) establishing the factorisation A+B=A(A+B)TB and taking determinants. Both must be present. The factorisation step must be verified by expanding; just stating it without proof loses points.
20-mark question (Householder, 2020): Four sub-parts with roughly equal weight. Sub-parts (i)–(iii) are each a few lines; sub-part (iv) is the calculation. Common deductions: missing the uTu=1 step in the orthogonality proof (2–3 marks), arithmetic error in the outer product (1–2 marks per entry).
Practice Set
(No unseen questions in the corpus for this atom; all three are worked above.)
We've mapped all 13 years of this exam. Get new chapters, tools, and solutions as we release them — free.