Quotient Vector Space V/W
At a Glance
- Frequency: 1 sub-part across 1 of 13 years (2025)
- Priority tier: T4
- Marks (count): 8 (1)
- Average solve time: ~12 min
- Difficulty mix: medium 1
- Section: A | Dominant type: proof
Why This Chapter Matters
The quotient space is the natural arena for the First Isomorphism Theorem and the rank–nullity theorem reread through abstract algebra. UPSC 2025 set an 8-mark Section A question on this atom — almost certainly asking for a proof of the dimension formula or a construction of a basis for . The topic demands a clean definition-proof style and rewards candidates who can navigate coset notation without getting lost in abstraction.
Minimum Theory
Setup. Let be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field , and let be a subspace of .
Cosets. For , the coset of modulo is
Two cosets are equal iff their representatives differ by an element of : The cosets partition .
Quotient space. The set of all cosets is a vector space under: These operations are well-defined (independent of the choice of coset representative). The zero element is .
Well-definedness check. Suppose , i.e., , and similarly . Then , so . Scalar multiplication is checked similarly.
Dimension formula (Codimension theorem).
Proof. Let and . Choose a basis for and extend to a basis for .
Claim: is a basis for .
Spanning. Any coset with satisfies since is absorbed into the coset.
Linear independence. Suppose (the zero coset). Then , so for some scalars . Rearranging, . Since is a basis for , all coefficients are zero; in particular for all .
Hence is a basis of size , giving .
Analogy. This mirrors the index formula for groups: , with dimension playing the role of logarithm of order.
Question Archetypes
| Archetype | Recognition |
|---|---|
| dimension-formula-proof | ”Prove “ |
| basis-construction | ”Find a basis for ; determine “ |
| well-definedness-proof | ”Show the operations on are well-defined” |
dimension-formula-proof (1 question(s); 2025)
Recognition Cues
- The question asks to “prove” or “establish” the dimension formula.
- May specify or a polynomial space and a concrete ; asks for both the proof and an explicit basis.
- 8 marks: the proof itself is the core; a concrete illustration earns the last mark or two.
- Key setup signal: “quotient space ” or “factor space.”
Solution Template
- Define and its operations (2–3 lines; do not skip).
- State what you will prove; choose a basis for and extend to for .
- Define .
- Prove spanning: any coset is a linear combination of elements of (absorb -components).
- Prove independence: a zero linear combination forces all coefficients zero via the independence of the basis of .
- Conclude .
- (If asked) Apply to the given concrete and .
Worked Example
2025 Paper 1, 2025-P1-Q1d (8 marks)
Let and . Prove that is a vector space and determine . Find a basis for .
Step 1. Identify and its dimension.
is the solution space of , a homogeneous system with one equation in three unknowns. Hence .
A basis for : , .
Step 2. Extend to a basis for .
We need to add a vector not in . Take ; check: , so .
The set is a basis for (its determinant equals ).
Step 3. is a vector space.
is a subspace of , so the coset operations (addition and scalar multiplication defined above) are well-defined and satisfy all vector space axioms. (The standard verification — closure, associativity, zero element , negatives — follows directly from the corresponding properties in .)
Step 4. Basis for .
By the proof of the dimension formula, is a basis for .
Spanning: Any can be written as for appropriate (solvable since is a basis). Hence .
Independence: If , then , i.e., , i.e., .
Step 5. Conclusion.
with basis .
Common Traps
- Confusing the coset with the vector ; remember that does not imply — it only implies .
- Skipping the well-definedness check for operations: UPSC proof questions penalise missing steps, even if the conclusion is correct.
- In the spanning argument, forgetting to explain why the -components vanish (they are absorbed into the coset because elements of shift a coset to itself).
- Giving (division, not subtraction) — a common confusion from the group-index analogy.
Marks-Aware Writing
At 8 marks (Section A, ~12 min), allocate roughly: 1 mark for defining and its operations; 1 mark for the basis-extension setup; 3 marks for the spanning and independence arguments (the core proof); 1 mark for invoking the dimension count; 2 marks for the concrete application (basis, ). Write the independence argument with a displayed equation — examiners look for the line ”, hence , hence .”
Practice Set
Only one historical question on this atom (shown above).