The math optional, made finite. Daily Practice

Absolute and conditional convergence

At a Glance

Why This Chapter Matters

Alternating-series questions appear in Section A compulsory (Q1) almost every year, always for 10 marks. The question always asks: does the series converge? Is the convergence absolute or conditional? The answer is always: yes (Leibniz); conditional (absolute series diverges by comparison with 1/np\sum1/n^p for p1p\le1). The 2016 question requires proving Leibniz and the harmonic divergence from scratch — that proof is worth knowing in full. The 2022 and 2023 questions add the ratio test and Raabe’s test for the absolute part.

Minimum Theory

Absolute convergence. an\sum a_n is absolutely convergent if an\sum|a_n| converges. Absolute convergence implies convergence.

Conditional convergence. an\sum a_n converges but an\sum|a_n| diverges.

Leibniz alternating series test. If an>0a_n>0, ana_n is decreasing, and an0a_n\to0, then (1)n+1an\sum(-1)^{n+1}a_n converges.

Proof sketch: Even partial sums S2mS_{2m} are non-decreasing and bounded above by a1a_1; odd partial sums satisfy S2m+1=S2m+a2m+1S_{2m+1}=S_{2m}+a_{2m+1}; both converge to the same limit.

Convergence tests for an\sum|a_n|:

TestWhen to use
pp-series comparison: anc/npa_n\sim c/n^pp>1p>1 converges; p1p\le1 diverges
Ratio testTerms involve factorials, powers, or nnn^n
Raabe’s testRatio test gives limit exactly 1

Raabe’s test. If limnn ⁣(anan+11)=L\lim_{n\to\infty}n\!\left(\dfrac{a_n}{a_{n+1}}-1\right)=L, then the series converges absolutely if L>1L>1 and diverges if L<1L<1.

Decision tree for absolute vs conditional convergence

Question Archetypes

ArchetypeRecognition
conditional-convergenceAlternating series (1)n+1an\sum(-1)^{n+1}a_n; apply Leibniz + comparison test on $\sum
ratio-testPower-series type; ratio an+1/anLa_{n+1}/a_n\to L; classify by LL vs 1
ratio-raabe-testRatio test inconclusive at boundary; Raabe test resolves x=1x=1

conditional-convergence (3 question(s); 2015, 2016, 2018)

Recognition Cues — Alternating series (1)n+1an\sum(-1)^{n+1}a_n where ana_n involves 1/n1/n or 1/(n+a)p1/(n+a)^p; asked for “absolute and conditional” convergence or “range of pp.”

Solution Template

  1. Verify Leibniz conditions: an>0a_n>0, ana_n decreasing (compute f(x)<0f'(x)<0 for large xx), an0a_n\to0.
  2. Conclude convergence by Leibniz.
  3. Test an\sum|a_n| by limit comparison with 1/np\sum1/n^p.
  4. Classify: converges absolutely iff p>1p>1; conditionally iff 0<p10<p\le1.

Worked Example 1

2015 Paper 2, 2015-P2-Q1c (10 marks)

Test convergence and absolute convergence of n=1(1)n+1nn2+1\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty(-1)^{n+1}\frac{n}{n^2+1}.

Set an=n/(n2+1)a_n=n/(n^2+1). Leibniz: an>0a_n>0; f(x)=x/(x2+1)f(x)=x/(x^2+1) has f(x)=(1x2)/(x2+1)2<0f'(x)=(1-x^2)/(x^2+1)^2<0 for x>1x>1, so ana_n is decreasing; an1/n0a_n\sim1/n\to0. All conditions hold — series converges.

For absolute convergence: an1/na_n\sim1/n. Limit comparison with 1/n\sum1/n: limnan=limn2/(n2+1)=1>0\lim na_n=\lim n^2/(n^2+1)=1>0. Since 1/n\sum1/n diverges (p=1p=1), so does an\sum a_n. Not absolutely convergentconditionally convergent. \blacksquare

Worked Example 2

2018 Paper 2, 2018-P2-Q1d (10 marks)

n=1(1)n+1(n+a)p\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{(n+a)^p}, a>0a>0. Find: (i) range of pp for absolute convergence; (ii) range of pp for conditional convergence.

Leibniz: bn=1/(n+a)p>0b_n=1/(n+a)^p>0, decreasing ((n+a)p(n+a)^p increasing), bn0b_n\to0 for all p>0p>0. Series converges for all p>0p>0.

Absolute series: 1/(n+a)p\sum1/(n+a)^p. Limit comparison with 1/np\sum1/n^p gives ratio 1\to1, same convergence behaviour. Converges iff p>1p>1.

(i)  p>1;(ii)  0<p1.\boxed{(i)\;p>1;\quad(ii)\;0<p\le1.}

Worked Example 3

2016 Paper 2, 2016-P2-Q2a (15 marks)

Show n=1(1)n+1n+1\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+1} is conditionally convergent. Prove any theorems used.

Convergence (Leibniz test + proof): an=1/(n+1)>0a_n=1/(n+1)>0, strictly decreasing, an0a_n\to0. Leibniz proof: even partial sums S2m=k=1m(a2k1a2k)S_{2m}=\sum_{k=1}^m(a_{2k-1}-a_{2k}) are non-decreasing (each bracket 0\ge0) and bounded above by a1a_1; odd sums S2m+1=S2m+a2m+1SS_{2m+1}=S_{2m}+a_{2m+1}\to S since a2m+10a_{2m+1}\to0. Both subsequences converge to the same limit. ✓

Divergence of an\sum|a_n|: n=11/(n+1)=k=21/k\sum_{n=1}^\infty1/(n+1)=\sum_{k=2}^\infty1/k is the harmonic series minus its first term. Proof of harmonic divergence: group in blocks (12)+(13+14)+(15++18)+(\frac12)+(\frac13+\frac14)+(\frac15+\cdots+\frac18)+\cdots; the jj-th block (2j12^{j-1} terms starting from 2j1+12^{j-1}+1) sums to 2j11/2j=1/2\ge2^{j-1}\cdot1/2^j=1/2. Infinitely many blocks each contribute 1/2\ge1/2, so partial sums \to\infty. ✓

Hence conditionally convergent. \blacksquare

Common Traps

ratio-test (1 question(s); 2022)

Worked Example

2022 Paper 2, 2022-P2-Q4b (15 marks)

Test n=1nnxnn!\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{n^n x^n}{n!} for x>0x>0.

an+1/an=x(1+1/n)nxea_{n+1}/a_n = x(1+1/n)^n\to xe as nn\to\infty. Ratio test: converges if xe<1xe<1, diverges if xe>1xe>1.

At x=1/ex=1/e: an1/2πna_n\sim1/\sqrt{2\pi n} (Stirling: n!2πn(n/e)nn!\sim\sqrt{2\pi n}(n/e)^n). Since 1/n\sum1/\sqrt{n} diverges (p-series, p=1/2<1p=1/2<1), diverges also at x=1/ex=1/e.

Converges for x<1/e;  diverges for x1/e.\boxed{\text{Converges for }x<1/e;\;\text{diverges for }x\ge1/e.}

ratio-raabe-test (1 question(s); 2023)

Worked Example

2023 Paper 2, 2023-P2-Q1c (10 marks)

Test n=1(2n1)!!(2n)!!x2n+12n+1\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\cdot\frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1} for x>0x>0.

Ratio an+1/an=(2n+1)2/((2n+2)(2n+3))x2x2a_{n+1}/a_n=(2n+1)^2/((2n+2)(2n+3))\cdot x^2\to x^2. Converges for x2<1x^2<1, diverges for x2>1x^2>1, inconclusive at x=1x=1.

Raabe at x=1x=1: limn(an/an+11)=limn(2n+2)(2n+3)/(2n+1)2n3/2>1\lim n(a_n/a_{n+1}-1)=\lim n\cdot(2n+2)(2n+3)/(2n+1)^2-n\to3/2>1. Converges at x=1x=1.

Converges for 0<x1;  diverges for x>1.\boxed{\text{Converges for }0<x\le1;\;\text{diverges for }x>1.}

Marks-Aware Writing

For 10-mark convergence questions: three explicit steps — Leibniz conditions stated and verified; conclude convergence; limit-comparison with 1/np\sum1/n^p for the absolute series. Box the final classification.

For the 15-mark question (2016) requiring proofs: write the full Leibniz proof (even partial sums non-decreasing and bounded; odd sums sandwich) AND the dyadic-blocking proof of harmonic divergence. These proofs together are 8–10 marks; missing either means half-marks at most.

Practice Set

We've mapped all 13 years of this exam. Get new chapters, tools, and solutions as we release them — free.