CSAT Solved Papers/ 2022/Q19

2022 CSAT — Q19

Quant Data sufficiency 2.5 marks Medium

Consider the Question and two Statements given below:

Question: Is xx an integer?

Statement-1: x/3x/3 is not an integer.

Statement-2: 3x3x is an integer.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the Question and the Statements?

  1. A Statement-1 alone is sufficient to answer the Question
  2. B Statement-2 alone is sufficient to answer the Question
  3. C Both Statement-1 and Statement-2 are sufficient to answer the Question
  4. D Both Statement-1 and Statement-2 are not sufficient to answer the Question Answer

Worked rationale

DS yes/no: for each statement, hunt one “yes” (integer) and one “no” (non-integer) case.

Statement-1 alone (x/3Zx/3 \notin \mathbb{Z}): x=11/3Zx = 1 \Rightarrow 1/3 \notin \mathbb{Z}, and x=1x=1 is an integer (yes); x=1/21/6Zx = 1/2 \Rightarrow 1/6 \notin \mathbb{Z}, and x=1/2x=1/2 is not an integer (no). Insufficient.

Statement-2 alone (3xZ3x \in \mathbb{Z}, i.e. x=k/3x = k/3): x=13x=3x = 1 \Rightarrow 3x = 3, integer (yes); x=1/33x=1x = 1/3 \Rightarrow 3x = 1, and x=1/3x = 1/3 is not an integer (no). Insufficient.

Both together (x/3Zx/3 \notin \mathbb{Z} and 3xZ3x \in \mathbb{Z}): write x=m/3x = m/3.

  • m=3x=1m = 3 \Rightarrow x = 1 (integer); x/3=1/3Zx/3 = 1/3 \notin \mathbb{Z} ✓ — yes.
  • m=1x=1/3m = 1 \Rightarrow x = 1/3 (not integer); x/3=1/9Zx/3 = 1/9 \notin \mathbb{Z} ✓ — no.

A “yes” and a “no” survive both statements together, so the answer is undecidable even jointly.

Answer: (d) Both Statement-1 and Statement-2 are not sufficient.

Why the other options miss

  • A
    thought it was enough when it wasn’t: reads ”x/3x/3 not integer” as ”xx not integer,” ignoring x=3x=3-type integers whose third is fractional.
  • B
    thought it was enough when it wasn’t: treats ”3x3x integer” as forcing xx integer, missing x=1/3x = 1/3.
  • C
    missed a case: combines to ”x=m/3x = m/3 with 3m3 \nmid m” and wrongly concludes non-integer, forgetting mm can be a multiple of 33 that still leaves x/3x/3 fractional (x=1x=1).

Specialist insight

The decisive pair is x=1x = 1 (integer) versus x=1/3x = 1/3 (non-integer): both satisfy ”3x3x integer” and ”x/3x/3 not integer” simultaneously. Writing x=m/3x = m/3 exposes that the two statements only constrain mm to not be a multiple of 99 — they never pin whether 3m3 \mid m. The counterexample pair breaks joint sufficiency, giving (d).

The trap, in one line

x=1x=1 and x=1/3x=1/3 both satisfy both statements yet differ on integrality \Rightarrow undecidable == (d).

← All 2022 CSAT questions