CSAT Solved Papers/ 2022/Q54

2022 CSAT — Q54

Quant Statement validity 2.5 marks Hard

Let A,BA, B and CC represent distinct non-zero digits. Suppose xx is the sum of all possible 33-digit numbers formed by A,BA, B and CC without repetition.

Consider the following statements:

  1. The 44-digit least value of xx is 13321332.

  2. The 33-digit greatest value of xx is 888888.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  1. A 1 only Answer
  2. B 2 only
  3. C Both 1 and 2
  4. D Neither 1 nor 2

Worked rationale

There are 3!=63! = 6 numbers; each digit lands in each place exactly 22 times. So

x=2(A+B+C)(100+10+1)=222(A+B+C).x = 2(A+B+C)\cdot(100 + 10 + 1) = 222\,(A+B+C).

Let S=A+B+CS = A+B+C. With distinct non-zero digits, the smallest sum is S=1+2+3=6S = 1+2+3 = 6, so the smallest possible xx is

xmin=222×6=1332.x_{\min} = 222 \times 6 = 1332.

Statement 1: the least value of xx is 13321332, which is indeed 44-digit. Since x=222S1332x = 222S \ge 1332 for every admissible triple, 13321332 is both the least value and a 44-digit number. Correct.

Statement 2: a 33-digit xx would need 222S<1000222S < 1000, i.e. S4S \le 4. But S6S \ge 6 always, so xx is never 33-digit — no 33-digit value of xx exists, let alone 888888 (=222×4= 222\times 4, which needs the impossible S=4S=4). Incorrect.

Answer: (a) 1 only.

Why the other options miss

  • B
    missed a case: computes 888=222×4888 = 222 \times 4 and forgets S=4S = 4 is impossible for three distinct non-zero digits.
  • C
    missed a case: accepts both numeric coincidences without checking the feasible range of SS.
  • D
    wrong formula: derives a wrong place-value coefficient (not 222222), rejecting the true Statement 1.

Specialist insight

The engine is the identity x=222(A+B+C)x = 222\,(A+B+C). Everything then turns on the range of SS: distinct non-zero digits give 6S246 \le S \le 24, so x{1332,,5328}x \in \{1332, \dots, 5328\} — always 44-digit. Statement 2 is a trap built on a value (888888) that would require S=4S = 4, which the constraints forbid. Always pin the attainable range before judging an extremum claim.

The trap, in one line

x=222Sx = 222S with S6x1332S \ge 6 \Rightarrow x \ge 1332 always; no 33-digit xx exists, so only (1) holds == (a).

← All 2022 CSAT questions