CSAT Solved Papers/ 2022/Q59
2022 CSAT — Q59
Consider the following statements in respect of a rectangular sheet of length cm and breadth cm:
-
It is possible to cut the sheet exactly into square sheets.
-
It is possible to cut the sheet into triangular sheets of equal area.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Worked rationale
Statement 1 — cut into squares (no waste). Peel off squares greedily:
That is four squares — two of side and two of side — exactly tiling the sheet with no leftover. Correct.
Statement 2 — cut into equal-area triangles. Area , so each triangle must be . Split the sheet into equal sub-rectangles ( each, area ); each sub-rectangle’s diagonal cuts it into triangles of area . That gives triangles, all of equal area. Correct.
Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2.
Visual solution
The same solve, worked by hand — read it, then trace it.
Why the other options miss
- A missed a case: doubts the equal-area triangulation, not seeing the -strips-times-diagonal construction.
- B missed a case: insists the squares must be equal and rejects (1), missing the dissection.
- D solved the wrong question: treats both dissections as impossible without attempting a construction.
Specialist insight
Both claims are constructive existence statements — produce one valid cut and the claim is true. Square dissection: peel the largest square () twice, then halve the remainder into two . Equal-area triangulation: any rectangle splits into equal triangles for even (here strips diagonal). The trap is reading ” square sheets” as ” equal squares,” which is not stated.
Squares tile it; strips diagonal give equal triangles — both hold (c).