2022 CSAT — Q8
A bill for Rs. is paid in the denominations of Rs. , Rs. and Rs. notes. notes in all are used. Consider the following statements:
-
notes of Rs. are used and the remaining are in the denominations of Rs. and Rs. .
-
notes of Rs. are used and the remaining are in the denominations of Rs. and Rs. .
-
notes of Rs. are used and the remaining are in the denominations of Rs. and Rs. .
Which of the above statements are not correct?
Worked rationale
Let be the counts of Rs. , Rs. , Rs. notes:
Divide the first by : . Subtract :
Feasibility (): ; . So — and the Rs. count must be at least .
Now test each claim:
- Statement 1 (): but — impossible. Not correct.
- Statement 2 (): , not an integer — impossible. Not correct.
- Statement 3 (): , not an integer — impossible. Not correct.
All three fail.
Answer: (d) 1, 2 and 3.
Why the other options miss
- A missed a case: catches the two infeasible counts but wrongly admits Statement 3 without checking has no integer solution.
- B missed a case: misses that already kills Statement 1.
- C an arithmetic slip: mis-solves and accepts .
Specialist insight
The whole problem collapses to one relation and the feasibility window . Each statement fixes one variable; you only have to check whether that value lands in range and yields integer partners. Two of the three fail an integrality test (, ) and one fails the range bound () — a clean reminder that “looks plausible” is not “is feasible.”
forces and integer partners; all of , , break it (d).