CSAT Solved Papers/ 2023/Q15
2023 CSAT — Q15
Consider the following in respect of prime number and composite number .
-
can be even.
-
can be odd.
-
can be odd.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Worked rationale
Each statement says “can be” — an existence claim. One witnessing example settles each one true; you do not need it to hold always.
Statement 3 ( odd): a product is odd only if both factors are odd. Take odd prime and odd composite : , odd. Can be true. ✓
Statement 2 ( odd): is even, so is odd is odd. Take (odd composite), any prime : is odd. Can be true. ✓
Statement 1 ( even): need it to be an even integer for some valid . Take : , an even integer. Can be true. ✓ (Another: .)
All three are achievable.
Answer: (d) 1, 2 and 3.
Why the other options miss
- A forgets composites can be odd: overlooks that composites need not be even ( are odd composites), so wrongly rules out odd.
- B demands be even always (or positive) rather than reading the “can be” as existence, rejecting Statement 1.
- C thinks is always even (treating as forced even), missing odd composites.
Specialist insight
The single recurring slip is assuming “composite even.” Composites include , all odd. Once you allow an odd composite, odd and odd both fall out immediately, and Statement 1 needs just one constructed pair (). The answer-craft move on “can be” claims is to hunt for one example, not to prove a universal — that flips a hard-looking item into three quick existence checks.
"Can be" existence; composites can be odd (), so all three hold (d).