CSAT Solved Papers/ 2023/Q65
2023 CSAT — Q65
In an examination, the maximum marks for each of the four papers namely and are . Marks scored by the students are in integers. A student can score in different ways. What is the value of ?
Worked rationale
of total marks is . Instead of counting score-tuples summing to , count the deficit from full marks: the total lost is , distributed over the four papers, with each paper losing to marks.
Let be the marks lost, and . Since the cap is never binding (the total deficit is only ), this is a plain stars-and-bars count:
Answer: (d) 35.
Why the other options miss
- A wrong formula: uses (deficit ) or a -style count, applying the wrong stars-and-bars parameters.
- B off by one: computes -adjacent values or adds the deficit wrongly ( vs ), landing near but below .
- C corrected for a case that doesn’t exist: subtracts phantom “over-” cases that don’t exist (the cap is never reached for a deficit of ), undercounting.
Specialist insight
The move that scores is the deficit reframe: counting ways to lose marks is far cleaner than ways to score , and it makes the cap obviously non-binding (you can’t lose more than overall). Then with stars, bins gives . Trying to apply the upper-bound (inclusion–exclusion) correction is wasted work here — and the source of the trap.
Count the deficit: , caps non-binding (d).