CSAT Solved Papers/ 2023/Q69
2023 CSAT — Q69
There are large number of silver coins weighing gm, gm, gm, gm, gm each. Consider the following statements:
-
To buy gm of coins one must buy at least coins.
-
To weigh gm using these coins one can use less than coins.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Worked rationale
Statement 1 — fewest coins whose weights sum to gm. Look mod : only the -gm coin is non-zero mod (). We need , so the number of -gm coins satisfies , hence .
Take (the four -gm coins give gm); the remaining gm from needs at least coins (). Total coins, and no combination does it in fewer. So at least coins — Statement 1 is true.
Statement 2 — weigh gm on a balance, where coins may sit on either pan (so subtraction is allowed). Then
using only coins . So less than coins suffices — Statement 2 is true.
Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2.
Why the other options miss
- A misses that weighing allows subtraction: reads “weigh” as “sum to” again, missing that balance weighing permits coins on both pans, so it never beats .
- B for Statement 1, finds a -coin sum by overlooking the mod- constraint that forces at least four -gm coins.
- D mis-solves the minimum-coin count and the balance construction, rejecting both.
Specialist insight
The two statements use different operations: “buy/sum to ” (coins add only) vs “weigh ” (balance — coins add or subtract). For the sum, the mod- argument is decisive: forces two-gm coins, pushing the minimum to . For the weighing, two-pan placement gives in coins. Reading “buy” vs “weigh” precisely — and knowing a balance allows subtraction — is exactly what separates (c) from the traps.
Summing forces two-gm coins (mod ) min (St-1 true); balance-weighing allows coins (St-2 true) (c).