CSAT Solved Papers/ 2024/Q55
2024 CSAT — Q55
Let and be positive integers satisfying and . What is the smallest value of that does not determine and uniquely?
Worked rationale
For a fixed sum , count the pairs of positive integers with (strict, so equal halves are excluded). We want the smallest giving more than one such pair.
- : only . Unique.
- : only — note is barred by . Unique.
- : and — two pairs. Not unique.
So is the first sum that fails to pin .
Answer: (c) 5.
Why the other options miss
- A solved the wrong question: thinks any sum has multiple splits, picking the smallest option without counting; has only .
- B missed a case: wrongly counts as a second pair for , ignoring the strict .
- D off by one: finds has two pairs and stops there, missing that already has two.
Specialist insight
The number of strict pairs summing to is , which first equals at . The two traps are (i) miscounting as a valid pair under (which would wrongly flag ), and (ii) walking past to a “more obviously multiple” sum. “Smallest value that does not determine uniquely” means find the first with partitions — test small in order and stop at the first failure. Strictness of is the whole subtlety.
Count strict pairs summing to : each have one, has two — so is the smallest non-unique sum (and never counts).