CSAT Solved Papers/ 2024/Q64
2024 CSAT — Q64
A Question is given followed by two Statements I and II. Consider the Question and the Statements.
Question: What are the unique values of and , where are distinct natural numbers?
Statement-I: is odd.
Statement-II: .
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Question and the Statements?
Worked rationale
Decide, don’t just compute — and read ” is odd” precisely: an odd value is an odd integer, so and the quotient is one of
Statement-I alone ( odd): infinitely many distinct pairs work — all give an odd integer quotient. Not unique.
Statement-II alone (): the distinct factor pairs are . Not unique.
Both together. Write , so . Test :
- : — not odd. ✗
- : — odd ✓, giving .
- : — not an integer. ✗
Only survives: ✓ and (odd) ✓. Unique.
Answer: (c) The Question can be answered by using both the Statements together, but cannot be answered using either Statement alone.
Why the other options miss
- A thought a statement was enough when it wasn’t: imagines odd plus the small search space already pins the pair, missing that Statement I alone admits infinitely many quotients.
- B thought either statement was enough when neither is: treats as if a single “natural” factor pair were intended, ignoring the six ordered possibilities.
- D stopped short of the combined condition: stops at “many factor pairs” without imposing , which eliminates every pair except .
Specialist insight
The decisive move is rewriting the two statements as one Diophantine condition: . Squaring the denominator is what shrinks the search to and the oddness of the cofactor kills and instantly. This is the general DS discipline — fold both statements into a single equation and test for a second admissible solution; here there is exactly one, so “together” suffices and neither alone does. Note the language trap: “odd” silently forces integrality (); a reader who allows to be a non-integer would wrongly think Statement I says almost nothing.
" odd" means an odd integer, so forces only when paired with — neither statement alone is unique .