CSAT Solved Papers/ 2024/Q79
2024 CSAT — Q79
What will come in place of in the sequence ?
Worked rationale
When a series isn’t an obvious arithmetic/geometric one, take differences — and use the known terms on both sides of the blank to lock the rule.
First differences: .
Second differences of the known run: — increasing by . Continue the second differences as :
- next first difference ,
- following first difference ✓ (matches the given last term).
The given final term confirms the pattern, so .
Cross-check (closed form). Each term is : , , , , , . ✓
Answer: (b) .
Why the other options miss
- A an arithmetic slip: takes the next first difference as (, a mis-stepped second difference) giving .
- C wrong formula: assumes a constant second difference of (), yielding or mishandled toward ; the second differences are not constant.
- D missed a case: fits only the left half (e.g. extrapolates first differences as doubling) and never checks the result against the given , which the rule must reproduce.
Specialist insight
The series is cubic, so its second differences form an arithmetic progression (, step ) — that is the structural signature to recognise instead of hunting for a multiplier. The masterstroke is using the given as a check: a correct rule must regenerate it, which immediately rejects any candidate that only fits the left side. The closed form is the elegant confirmation, but in the exam the two-row difference table plus the checkpoint is the faster, safer route.
Second differences run (AP, step ), so and it must regenerate the given — never accept a term that fits only the left of the blank.