CSAT Solved Papers/ 2024/Q80
2024 CSAT — Q80
In some code, letters represent numbers . It is not known which letter represents which number. If and , then what is the value of ?
Worked rationale
Treat the two equations as constraints that recover the unique assignment, then read off the answer.
Use . Among , which value tripled is also in the set?
- ✓ (both present)
- ✓ (both present)
- ✗
So two candidate cases. Now apply .
Case . Remaining values for are , and . Testing gives , none of which is an available value. Case fails.
Case . Remaining values for are , and . Testing : ✓ (available). Then (the last remaining).
So . Verify: ✓ and ✓.
Answer: (b) .
Why the other options miss
- A an arithmetic slip: gets the correct assignment but slips the final arithmetic ( or a mis-subtraction), landing one short.
- C missed a case: accepts the branch without checking that has no valid value, forcing an inconsistent assignment that returns .
- D gave up on a case too early: stops at “two cases for ” and declares the data insufficient, missing that eliminates the branch and pins everything.
Specialist insight
The item is a constraint-satisfaction puzzle disguised as coding. The move that scores is using to cut the five possibilities down to two cases, then letting the second equation act as the filter — has no solution in the branch, which is exactly the trap that pulls candidates toward “(c)” or “(d).” Always push both constraints through before declaring “insufficient data”: here the seemingly ambiguous setup is fully determined, and the unique assignment makes . The discipline — enumerate the few cases the first equation allows, then eliminate with the second — is the general key for letter-to-number coding under algebraic conditions.
leaves , but kills the branch, pinning so — don't quit at "two cases" and call it insufficient.