CSAT Solved Papers/ 2025/Q17
2025 CSAT — Q17
The petrol price shot up by as a result of the hike in crude oil prices. The price of petrol before the hike was ₹ per litre. A person travels km every month and his car gives a mileage of km per litre. By how many km should he reduce his travel if he wants to maintain his expenditure at the previous level?
Worked rationale
Expenditure (price per litre) (litres used), and litres used distance mileage. Hold the rupee budget fixed and let the distance fall.
Old monthly fuel litres; old cost (in ₹).
New price per litre. To keep the cost at ₹ , the litres he can now buy are
Reduction km.
Shortcut: a price rise means he can afford of the old distance, i.e. km — same km cut, no rupee figures needed.
Answer: (b) 200 km.
Why the other options miss
- A wrong base for the cut: cuts distance by of the wrong quantity or applies the reduction to litres ( L a too-small km figure).
- C wrong base for the cut: reduces by a flat of (), treating the distance cut as of the old distance rather than the that actually holds the budget.
- D an arithmetic slip: over-corrects (e.g. uses or mis-divides ), inflating the cut.
Specialist insight
The clean lens is “budget fixed, so quantity scales by the reciprocal of the price ratio.” A price means affordable quantity becomes of before — not . That single distinction kills the deadliest distractor (c) , which is just ” of .” The reciprocal route () avoids every rupee computation and is far faster under the clock. Mileage and price are both fixed, so they only set the conversion; the live variable is distance, and it moves as .
A price lets you afford of the distance (cut km), not (which gives the planted ).