CSAT Solved Papers/ 2025/Q29

2025 CSAT — Q29

Quant Number theory 2.5 marks Hard

Let PQRPQR be a 33-digit number, PPTPPT be a 33-digit number and PSPS be a 22-digit number, where P,Q,R,S,TP, Q, R, S, T are distinct non-zero digits. Further, PQRPS=PPTPQR - PS = PPT. If Q=3Q = 3 and T<6T < 6, then what is the number of possible values of (R,S)(R, S)?

  1. A 2
  2. B 3 Answer
  3. C 4
  4. D More than 4

Worked rationale

Write each numeral by place value. With Q=3Q=3:

PQR=100P+30+R,PS=10P+S,PPT=110P+T.PQR = 100P + 30 + R,\quad PS = 10P + S,\quad PPT = 110P + T.

The equation PQRPS=PPTPQR - PS = PPT becomes

100P+30+R10PS=110P+T    30+RST=20P    RST=20P30.100P + 30 + R - 10P - S = 110P + T \;\Longrightarrow\; 30 + R - S - T = 20P \;\Longrightarrow\; R - S - T = 20P - 30.

Since R,S,TR,S,T are single digits, RSTR - S - T lies in [17,7][-17, 7]. So 20P3020P-30 must too: P=1P=1 gives 10-10 (in range); P=2P=2 gives 1010 (impossible, exceeds 77). Hence P=1\boxed{P=1} and

R=S+T10.R = S + T - 10.

Constraints: all of P=1,Q=3,R,S,TP{=}1, Q{=}3, R, S, T distinct and non-zero; T<6T<6 so T{2,4,5}T \in \{2,4,5\} (excluding 1,31,3); R1R \ge 1.

  • T=2T=2: R=S81S=9, R=1=PR = S - 8 \ge 1 \Rightarrow S = 9,\ R = 1 = P — rejected. (no valid pair)
  • T=4T=4: R=S61S{7,8,9}R = S - 6 \ge 1 \Rightarrow S \in \{7,8,9\}. S=7R=1=PS=7\Rightarrow R=1=P ✗; S=8R=2S=8\Rightarrow R=2, digits {1,3,2,8,4}\{1,3,2,8,4\} distinct ✓; S=9R=3=QS=9\Rightarrow R=3=Q ✗. → (R,S)=(2,8)(R,S)=(2,8).
  • T=5T=5: R=S51S{6,7,8,9}R = S - 5 \ge 1 \Rightarrow S \in \{6,7,8,9\}. S=6R=1=PS=6\Rightarrow R=1=P ✗; S=7R=2S=7\Rightarrow R=2, {1,3,2,7,5}\{1,3,2,7,5\} ✓; S=8R=3=QS=8\Rightarrow R=3=Q ✗; S=9R=4S=9\Rightarrow R=4, {1,3,4,9,5}\{1,3,4,9,5\} ✓. → (R,S)=(2,7),(4,9)(R,S)=(2,7),(4,9).

Valid (R,S)(R,S): (2,8), (2,7), (4,9)(2,8),\ (2,7),\ (4,9)three pairs. Verify each by subtraction: 13218=114132-18=114 ✓, 13217=115132-17=115 ✓, 13419=115134-19=115 ✓.

Answer: (b) 3.

Why the other options miss

  • A
    missed a case: solves only T=4,5T=4,5 partially or misses the T=5, S=9T=5,\ S=9 branch, ending with two pairs.
  • C
    missed a case: counts a clashing pair (e.g. keeps S=9,R=3S=9,R=3 where R=QR=Q, or S=7,R=1S=7,R=1 where R=PR=P) without enforcing distinctness.
  • D
    solved the wrong question: ignores the distinct-and-non-zero constraint entirely, treating R=S+T10R=S+T-10 as freely solvable.

Specialist insight

The decisive structural cut is the place-value identity reducing four unknowns to RST=20P30R - S - T = 20P - 30, which pins P=1P=1 in one line (the only value keeping the right side inside the digit-range [17,7][-17,7]). After that the work is a tight, distinctness-checked enumeration over T{2,4,5}T \in \{2,4,5\}. The trap is forgetting that RR must differ from the already-used P=1P=1 and Q=3Q=3 — three of the would-be solutions die exactly on that clash. CSAT rewards the candidate who carries the distinctness constraint through every branch rather than counting raw arithmetic solutions.

The trap, in one line

Place value forces P=1P=1 and R=S+T10R=S+T-10; enforcing distinct non-zero digits kills the clashing branches, leaving exactly (2,8),(2,7),(4,9)(2,8),(2,7),(4,9) — three pairs.

← All 2025 CSAT questions