2025 CSAT — Q5
A natural number is such that it can be expressed as , where , and are distinct factors of . How many numbers below have this property?
Worked rationale
We need three distinct factors of whose sum is itself. The largest proper factor of is (and it exists only if is even), so any sum of three factors that reaches the full must lean on the large ones. The clean structural fact:
So every multiple of automatically has the property: take , three distinct factors summing to . Below the multiples of are
Is there any non-multiple of that also works? The only triples of unit fractions with are — the divisor triple must be , which forces . (E.g. repeats a factor; .) No non-multiple of qualifies.
Answer: (c) 8.
Why the other options miss
- A counted one too few, twice over: counts , dropping itself (mistakenly ruling out ) and — a double boundary miss.
- B stopped one short: lists the multiples of but stops at , forgetting (the upper-boundary slip).
- D missed a case: adds a spurious extra number (often or ), failing to check that its factors cannot give three distinct ones summing to .
Specialist insight
The whole problem collapses once you see it as a unit-fraction identity: with means are three distinct positive integers whose reciprocals sum to . The only such reciprocal triple is , so the property is exactly equivalent to ” is a multiple of .” That reframing turns a hunt-and-check item into a one-line count () and protects you from both boundary slips. Under the clock, recognising the identity is worth far more than testing numbers one by one.
The property is *exactly* ""; the deadly errors are dropping or the top value — count .