CSAT Solved Papers/ 2025/Q53

2025 CSAT — Q53

Verbal Reading comprehension 2.5 marks Medium

Passage

“A good statesman, like any other sensible human being, learns more from his opponents than from his fervent supporters. For his supporters will push him to disaster unless his opponents show him where the dangers are. So if he is wise he will often pray to be delivered from his friends, because they will ruin him. But, though it hurts, he ought also to pray never to be left without opponents; for they keep him on the path of reason and good sense. The national unity of free people depends upon a sufficiently even balance of political power to make it impracticable for the administration to be arbitrary and for opposition to be revolutionary and irreconcilable.”

Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?

  1. A Without opposition parties, the administration in a democracy gets to become more responsible.
  2. B Democracy needs to have revolutionaries in opposition to keep the government alert.
  3. C Rulers in a democracy need the support of opposition for their political survival.
  4. D In a democracy, the opposition is indispensable for the balance of political power and good governance. Answer

Thinking pathway

Locate. This asks for the central idea, so find the author’s culminating claim. The passage builds from “a statesman learns more from his opponents” to its summit: national unity “depends upon a sufficiently even balance of political power” so the administration can’t be arbitrary and opposition can’t be revolutionary. The indispensability of a balanced opposition is the anchor.

Test (thesis-vs-detail + scope-fit). The key must state that opposition is essential to the balance of power and good governance — and must not flip the passage’s direction or endorse the extremes the author warns against. (d) — “the opposition is indispensable for the balance of political power and good governance” — is exactly the author’s summit claim.

Eliminate by anatomy. (a) gets the direction backwards — the passage says without opponents the statesman is ruined; (a) claims the administration becomes more responsible without opposition, the reverse. (b) is half right, half wrong and gets the direction backwards — it endorses “revolutionaries,” the very thing the author says the balance exists to prevent. (c) is a claim the passage never actually makes — “support of opposition for political survival” misreads the relationship; the author’s point is checking power, not survival via support. Key: (d).

Evidence in the text

“he ought also to pray never to be left without opponents; for they keep him on the path of reason and good sense. The national unity of free people depends upon a sufficiently even balance of political power to make it impracticable for the administration to be arbitrary and for opposition to be revolutionary.” The critical message is that opposition is indispensable for the balance of power and good governance (d).

Worked rationale

The author argues that a good statesman needs opponents — they “keep him on the path of reason and good sense” — and that national unity rests on “a sufficiently even balance of political power” so that the administration cannot be arbitrary nor the opposition revolutionary. The critical message is that opposition is indispensable for the balance of political power and good governance.

(d) states this. Answer: (d).

Why the other options miss

  • A
    gets the direction backwards: the passage says without opponents the statesman is “ruined”; (a) claims the opposite — that administration becomes more responsible without opposition.
  • B
    gets the direction backwards: endorses “revolutionaries in opposition,” but the author wants a balance that keeps opposition from being “revolutionary and irreconcilable.”
  • C
    a claim the passage never actually makes: reframes the relationship as rulers needing opposition support for survival; the passage is about checking arbitrary power, not survival.

Specialist insight

Every distractor flips or distorts the author’s direction: (a) reverses the value of opposition, (b) endorses the extreme the author warns against, (c) swaps “check on power” for “support for survival.” On a central-idea question for a balance-of-power argument, the key is the option that preserves both the indispensability of opposition and the balance (neither arbitrary administration nor revolutionary opposition). That is (d).

The trap, in one line

(b) endorses "revolutionaries," the very extreme the author's balance exists to prevent; the message is opposition as a balance for good governance — (d).

← All 2025 CSAT questions