CSAT Solved Papers/ 2025/Q61
2025 CSAT — Q61
Passage
There has been no democracy that has grown economically without corporate capitalism. It helps in modernizing the economy and enabling the transition from rural to urban, and agriculture to industry and services, which are inevitable with growth. It generates jobs — and there is no other way to fix a country’s unemployment challenge without a further impetus to private business. Big companies can operate on a large scale and become competitive both domestically and externally. A vibrant corporate capitalist base also leads to additional revenues for the State — which in turn, can be used for greater welfare for the marginalized and creating a more level playing field in terms of opportunities.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Thinking pathway
Locate. This asks for the central idea — the load-bearing thesis — so find what the passage asserts and to what extent. It opens with growth (“no democracy that has grown economically without corporate capitalism”) and closes with the democratic payoff (“additional revenues… welfare for the marginalized… a more level playing field”). The through-line couples economic growth and democratic benefit. That is the anchor.
Test — the thesis, not a detail; and check the fit. The key must say corporate capitalism is important for growth and for democracy, without inflating into “imperative / survival / mutual dependence.” (a) — “important for economic growth of a State and also for democracy” — matches both halves at the right strength.
Eliminate by anatomy. (b) makes a claim the passage never actually makes — “achieve its political objectives” is a goal the passage never names. (c) over-states the case — “no State can ensure its economic survival for long without” is an absolutist survival claim past the text’s “grown economically.” (d) also over-states — “mutual dependence for continued existence” asserts a symmetric existential dependence the passage doesn’t establish (it shows democracies need corporate capitalism to grow and that it funds welfare, not that each exists only via the other). Key: (a).
Evidence in the text
“There has been no democracy that has grown economically without corporate capitalism… A vibrant corporate capitalist base also leads to additional revenues for the State — which in turn, can be used for greater welfare for the marginalized and creating a more level playing field.” The message pairs economic growth with benefits to democracy (welfare, level playing field) — corporate capitalism is important both for growth and for democracy (a).
Worked rationale
The passage argues corporate capitalism drives modernization, jobs, and competitiveness, and that its revenues fund “greater welfare for the marginalized and creating a more level playing field.” So it is presented as important both for economic growth and, through that welfare and fairness, for democracy.
(a) captures both at the passage’s actual strength. Answer: (a).
Why the other options miss
- B out of scope: “political objectives” of the State is not in the passage; the passage’s payoff is welfare and a level playing field, not political goals.
- C too strong for the text: “no State can ensure its economic survival for long without” overshoots the passage’s “grown economically” into an existential-survival claim.
- D too strong for the text: “mutual dependence for their continued existence” asserts a symmetric existential tie; the passage shows growth-dependence one way and welfare-benefit the other, not mutual existence.
Specialist insight
The real contest is (a) vs (d). (d) is tempting because the passage does link corporate capitalism and democracy — but it links them as “important for” (growth + welfare), not as “mutually dependent for continued existence,” which is a far stronger, symmetric claim. On a central-idea question, choose the option that matches the strength of the author’s link. (a) says “important… and also for democracy”; (d) escalates to existential co-dependence the text doesn’t support.
(d) escalates the passage's "important for growth and democracy" into symmetric "mutual dependence for existence"; (a) keeps the right strength.