CSAT Solved Papers/ 2025/Q71

2025 CSAT — Q71

Verbal Reading comprehension 2.5 marks Medium

Passage

A single number for inflation is an aggregate across different commodities and services — the price rise differs for different items of consumption. So, the single number is arrived at by assigning weights to different commodities and services. For WPI, the weights in production are used; for CPI, the consumption basket is used. But people are not homogeneous. The consumption basket is vastly different for the poor, the middle classes, and the rich. Hence, the CPI is different for each of these classes and a composite index requires averaging the baskets.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and crucial message conveyed by the passage?

  1. A We must use WPI exclusively in measuring price rise and CPI should be done away with.
  2. B The present calculation of inflation rate does not correctly measure price rise of individual item/commodity. Answer
  3. C Inflation data under-presents services in the consumption basket.
  4. D Knowledge of inflation rate is not really of any use to anybody in the country.

Thinking pathway

Locate. This asks for the central idea — the passage’s load-bearing point — so find what its mechanism is built to show. The whole passage explains that one inflation number is an aggregate hiding very different price rises across items and across classes (poor/middle/rich baskets differ “vastly”). The point of all that machinery is that the single number misrepresents the individual case. That is the anchor.

Test — the thesis, not a detail; and check the fit. The key must state that the aggregate fails to measure the price rise of an individual item/consumer. (b) — “the present calculation of inflation rate does not correctly measure price rise of individual item/commodity” — is exactly the consequence the passage builds to.

Eliminate by anatomy. (a) is both outside the passage and too strong — “use WPI exclusively… CPI done away with” is a prescription the passage never makes; it explains why both are aggregates, not which to scrap. (c) is out of scope — “under-presents services” picks one word (“services”) and invents a claim the passage doesn’t make. (d) over-states the case — “not really of any use to anybody” is an absurd absolutism; the passage critiques the aggregate’s precision, not the value of inflation data. Key: (b).

Evidence in the text

“A single number for inflation is an aggregate across different commodities and services — the price rise differs for different items of consumption… The consumption basket is vastly different for the poor, the middle classes, and the rich. Hence, the CPI is different for each of these classes and a composite index requires averaging the baskets.” The crux is that a single aggregate inflation number fails to capture the price rise of individual items/consumers — (b).

Worked rationale

The passage explains that a single inflation figure is an aggregate built by weighting many items, that people’s consumption baskets differ “vastly” by class, and that “a composite index requires averaging the baskets.” The crucial message is that this single aggregate does not accurately measure the price rise faced by an individual item or consumer.

(b) states this. Answer: (b).

Why the other options miss

  • A
    too strong for the text: “use WPI exclusively… CPI done away with” is a policy prescription absent from the passage, which explains both indices rather than ranking them.
  • C
    out of scope: “under-presents services” fixates on the word “services” and asserts a claim the passage never makes about under-representation.
  • D
    too strong for the text: “not of any use to anybody” is an absurd absolutism; the passage questions the aggregate’s accuracy, not the usefulness of inflation data.

Specialist insight

Three distractors share the over-claim anatomy: (a) prescribes scrapping CPI, (d) dismisses inflation data wholesale, (c) invents a services claim. The passage’s actual, measured point is narrower and sharper — an aggregate hides individual variation. On a central-idea question, the key restates the author’s analytical point at its real scope; it does not turn a measurement critique into a policy demand or a nihilistic dismissal.

The trap, in one line

(a)/(d) turn a measurement critique into "scrap CPI" / "inflation data is useless"; the crux is that the aggregate misses individual price rises — (b).

← All 2025 CSAT questions