← 2013 Paper 2

UPSC 2013 Maths Optional Paper 2 Q1c — Step-by-Step Solution

10 marks · Section A

Riemann integral · Real Analysis · asked 10× in 13 yrs · Read the full method →

Question

Let f(x)={x22+4if x0x22+2if x<0f(x)=\begin{cases}\dfrac{x^{2}}{2}+4 & \text{if }x\ge 0\\ -\dfrac{x^{2}}{2}+2 & \text{if }x<0\end{cases}. Is ff Riemann integrable in the interval [1,2][-1,2]? Why? Does there exist a function gg such that g(x)=f(x)g'(x)=f(x)? Justify your answer.

Technique

Lebesgue criterion for Riemann integrability; Darboux’s theorem rules out the antiderivative.

Solution

Part 1 — Riemann integrability

Step 1 — Boundedness on [1,2][-1,2].

On [0,2][0,2]: f(x)=x2/2+4[4,6]f(x)=x^{2}/2+4\in[4,\,6]. On [1,0)[-1,0): f(x)=x2/2+2[3/2,2)f(x)=-x^{2}/2+2\in[3/2,\,2).

So ff is bounded on [1,2][-1,2] (between 3/2 and 6).

Step 2 — Set of discontinuities.

On (0,2](0,2] and on [1,0)[-1,0), ff is polynomial — hence continuous.

At x=0x=0: limx0+f(x)=4\lim_{x\to 0^+}f(x)=4 but limx0f(x)=2\lim_{x\to 0^-}f(x)=2. Jump discontinuity at x=0x=0.

So ff has exactly one discontinuity on [1,2][-1,2], namely x=0x=0 — a measure-zero set.

Step 3 — Apply Lebesgue criterion.

A bounded function on a closed interval is Riemann integrable iff its set of discontinuities has Lebesgue measure zero. The single point {0}\{0\} has measure zero.

  f is Riemann integrable on [1,2].  \boxed{\;f\text{ is Riemann integrable on }[-1,2].\;}

Part 2 — Existence of an antiderivative

Claim. No function gg with g(x)=f(x)g'(x)=f(x) for all x[1,2]x\in[-1,2] exists.

Proof via Darboux’s theorem (intermediate value property of derivatives).

Darboux’s theorem: if gg is differentiable on an interval II, then gg' has the intermediate value property on II — i.e., for any a,bIa,b\in I and any value cc strictly between g(a)g'(a) and g(b)g'(b), there exists some ξ(a,b)\xi\in(a,b) with g(ξ)=cg'(\xi)=c.

In particular, gg' cannot have a jump discontinuity.

Our ff has a jump discontinuity at 00: f(0)=2,f(0+)=4f(0^-)=2,\,f(0^+)=4, f(0)=4f(0)=4. Any value c(2,4)c\in(2,4) — say c=3c=3 — is not attained by ff on [1,2][-1,2] (check: for x<0x<0, f(x)[3/2,2)f(x)\in[3/2,2), so 2\le 2; for x0x\ge 0, f(x)4f(x)\ge 4; the value 33 is skipped). So ff does not have the intermediate value property.

By Darboux, ff cannot be the derivative of any function.

Answer

  No such g exists.  \boxed{\;\text{No such }g\text{ exists.}\;}
We post more of this — worked solutions, CSAT trap breakdowns, guide chapters — a few times a week on Telegram. Free, no sign-in. Join

This solution is part of the Maths Coverage Map — 13 years, mapped. Get the take-away PDF free.