← 2014 Paper 2
UPSC 2014 Maths Optional Paper 2 Q1c — Step-by-Step Solution
10 marks · Section A
Cauchy-Riemann equations (necessary and sufficient) · Complex Analysis · asked 5× in 13 yrs · Read the full method →
Question
Prove that the function f(z)=u+iv, where
f(z)=x2+y2x3(1+i)−y3(1−i),z=0;f(0)=0
satisfies Cauchy–Riemann equations at the origin, but the derivative of f at z=0 does not exist.
Technique
Compute partial derivatives via limit definition at the singular point; verify CR; check path-dependence of the complex derivative.
Solution
Strategy. Compute partials at origin via the limit definition; verify CR; then compute the complex derivative limit along two different paths, finding different limits.
Step 1 — Separate u and v
The numerator x3(1+i)−y3(1−i)=(x3−y3)+i(x3+y3). So
u=x2+y2x3−y3,v=x2+y2x3+y3for (x,y)=(0,0),
with u(0,0)=v(0,0)=0.
Step 2 — Partial derivatives at origin (limit definition)
ux(0,0)=h→0limhu(h,0)−0=h→0limhh3/h2=h→0limhh=1.
uy(0,0)=k→0limku(0,k)−0=k→0limk−k3/k2=−1.
vx(0,0)=h→0limhv(h,0)=h→0limhh3/h2=1.
vy(0,0)=k→0limkv(0,k)=k→0limkk3/k2=1.
Step 3 — CR equations at origin
CR equations: ux=vy and uy=−vx.
ux(0,0)=1, vy(0,0)=1. ✓
uy(0,0)=−1, −vx(0,0)=−1. ✓
So CR equations are satisfied at the origin.
Step 4 — Differentiate via path approach
f′(0)=limz→0zf(z)−f(0)=limz→0zf(z).
Path 1: y=0, z=x→0.
f(z)=u+iv=x2x3+ix2x3=x+ix=x(1+i).
zf(z)=xx(1+i)=1+i.
Path 2: y=x, z=x+ix=x(1+i)→0.
At y=x: u=2x2x3−x3=0, v=2x2x3+x3=x. So f(z)=ix.
zf(z)=x(1+i)ix=1+ii=2i(1−i)=21+i.
The two limits 1+i and (1+i)/2 are different — so the path-dependent limit doesn’t have a unique value.
Answer
f′(0) does not exist (different limits along different paths).