← 2014 Paper 2

UPSC 2014 Maths Optional Paper 2 Q1c — Step-by-Step Solution

10 marks · Section A

Cauchy-Riemann equations (necessary and sufficient) · Complex Analysis · asked 5× in 13 yrs · Read the full method →

Question

Prove that the function f(z)=u+ivf(z)=u+iv, where

f(z)=x3(1+i)y3(1i)x2+y2,  z0;  f(0)=0f(z)=\frac{x^3(1+i)-y^3(1-i)}{x^2+y^2},\;z\ne 0;\;f(0)=0

satisfies Cauchy–Riemann equations at the origin, but the derivative of ff at z=0z=0 does not exist.

Technique

Compute partial derivatives via limit definition at the singular point; verify CR; check path-dependence of the complex derivative.

Solution

Strategy. Compute partials at origin via the limit definition; verify CR; then compute the complex derivative limit along two different paths, finding different limits.

Step 1 — Separate uu and vv

The numerator x3(1+i)y3(1i)=(x3y3)+i(x3+y3)x^{3}(1+i)-y^{3}(1-i)=(x^{3}-y^{3})+i(x^{3}+y^{3}). So

u=x3y3x2+y2,v=x3+y3x2+y2for (x,y)(0,0),u=\dfrac{x^{3}-y^{3}}{x^{2}+y^{2}},\quad v=\dfrac{x^{3}+y^{3}}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\quad\text{for }(x,y)\ne(0,0),

with u(0,0)=v(0,0)=0u(0,0)=v(0,0)=0.

Step 2 — Partial derivatives at origin (limit definition)

ux(0,0)=limh0u(h,0)0h=limh0h3/h2h=limh0hh=1.u_x(0,0)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{u(h,0)-0}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h^{3}/h^{2}}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h}{h}=1. uy(0,0)=limk0u(0,k)0k=limk0k3/k2k=1.u_y(0,0)=\lim_{k\to 0}\frac{u(0,k)-0}{k}=\lim_{k\to 0}\frac{-k^{3}/k^{2}}{k}=-1. vx(0,0)=limh0v(h,0)h=limh0h3/h2h=1.v_x(0,0)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{v(h,0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h^{3}/h^{2}}{h}=1. vy(0,0)=limk0v(0,k)k=limk0k3/k2k=1.v_y(0,0)=\lim_{k\to 0}\frac{v(0,k)}{k}=\lim_{k\to 0}\frac{k^{3}/k^{2}}{k}=1.

Step 3 — CR equations at origin

CR equations: ux=vyu_x=v_y and uy=vxu_y=-v_x.

ux(0,0)=1u_x(0,0)=1, vy(0,0)=1v_y(0,0)=1. ✓ uy(0,0)=1u_y(0,0)=-1, vx(0,0)=1-v_x(0,0)=-1. ✓

So CR equations are satisfied at the origin.

Step 4 — Differentiate via path approach

f(0)=limz0f(z)f(0)z=limz0f(z)zf'(0)=\lim_{z\to 0}\dfrac{f(z)-f(0)}{z}=\lim_{z\to 0}\dfrac{f(z)}{z}.

Path 1: y=0y=0, z=x0z=x\to 0. f(z)=u+iv=x3x2+ix3x2=x+ix=x(1+i)f(z)=u+iv=\dfrac{x^{3}}{x^{2}}+i\dfrac{x^{3}}{x^{2}}=x+ix=x(1+i). f(z)z=x(1+i)x=1+i\dfrac{f(z)}{z}=\dfrac{x(1+i)}{x}=1+i.

Path 2: y=xy=x, z=x+ix=x(1+i)0z=x+ix=x(1+i)\to 0. At y=xy=x: u=x3x32x2=0u=\dfrac{x^{3}-x^{3}}{2x^{2}}=0, v=x3+x32x2=xv=\dfrac{x^{3}+x^{3}}{2x^{2}}=x. So f(z)=ixf(z)=ix. f(z)z=ixx(1+i)=i1+i=i(1i)2=1+i2\dfrac{f(z)}{z}=\dfrac{ix}{x(1+i)}=\dfrac{i}{1+i}=\dfrac{i(1-i)}{2}=\dfrac{1+i}{2}.

The two limits 1+i1+i and (1+i)/2(1+i)/2 are different — so the path-dependent limit doesn’t have a unique value.

Answer

  f(0) does not exist (different limits along different paths).  \boxed{\;f'(0)\text{ does not exist (different limits along different paths).}\;}
We post more of this — worked solutions, CSAT trap breakdowns, guide chapters — a few times a week on Telegram. Free, no sign-in. Join

This solution is part of the Maths Coverage Map — 13 years, mapped. Get the take-away PDF free.