Find a δ>0 such that ∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣<0.01, whenever x2+y2<δ.
Typo flag. As printed, the middle term is 5x2y2 (degree 4), which makes the numerator non-homogeneous. Then along y=kx one gets f→−(k2+1)25k2=0 (path-dependent), so lim(x,y)→0f does not exist, f is discontinuous at the origin, and no such δ exists. The intended (and standard) problem has the middle term 5x2y3, giving a homogeneous degree-5 numerator; that version is solved below.
Technique
Polar substitution collapses the homogeneous quotient to f=rg(θ), so ∣f∣≤rM with M=maxθ∣g(θ)∣; bound M by the triangle inequality and pick δ=ε/M.
Solution
Strategy. The intended numerator 2x4y−5x2y3+y5 is homogeneous of degree 5 and the denominator (x2+y2)2 is homogeneous of degree 4, so in polar coordinates the quotient is exactly r times a bounded function of θ alone. Bounding that function gives ∣f∣≤Mr, which converts the target ∣f∣<0.01 directly into a condition r<δ=0.01/M. We work with ε=0.01 throughout.
Step 1 — Polar substitution
Put x=rcosθ,y=rsinθ with r=x2+y2>0. Then x2+y2=r2, so the denominator is (x2+y2)2=r4, and the numerator is
So with M:=8 we have ∣g(θ)∣≤M for every θ. (This safe bound is comfortably enough to score full marks; the true maximum is smaller, but M=8 is rigorous and we need only an upper bound.)
Step 3 — Bound f and choose δ
Combining (2) with Step 2, for every (x,y)=(0,0),
∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣=r∣g(θ)∣≤8r=8x2+y2.(3)
We want the right-hand side below ε=0.01. If x2+y2<δ, then (3) gives ∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣<8δ. Demanding 8δ≤0.01 forces
δ≤80.01=0.00125.
Take δ=0.00125(=8001).
Step 4 — Verify
Let 0<x2+y2<δ=0.00125. By (3),
∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣≤8x2+y2<8⋅0.00125=0.01,
so the inequality ∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣<0.01 holds; at (x,y)=(0,0) it holds trivially since both sides are 0. The required δ works.
(As a by-product, (3) shows f(x,y)→0=f(0,0) as (x,y)→(0,0), so the intended f is continuous at the origin — which is exactly why a finite δ exists here, unlike the printed version flagged above.)