← 2023 Paper 2
UPSC 2023 Maths Optional Paper 2 Q4a — Step-by-Step Solution
15 marks · Section A
Riemann integral · Real Analysis · asked 10× in 13 yrs · Read the full method →
Question
Prove that the oscillation of a real-valued bounded function f defined on [a,b] is the supremum of the set {∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣:x1,x2∈[a,b]}.
Technique
Two-sided inequality on sup — bound from above using m≤f≤M, bound from below using the ε-characterisation of sup,inf.
Solution
Setup. Let f:[a,b]→R be bounded. By boundedness, M=sup[a,b]f and m=inf[a,b]f are finite. The oscillation of f on [a,b] is defined as
ω(f,[a,b])=M−m.
Define
S=sup{∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣:x1,x2∈[a,b]}.
We must prove S=M−m.
Step 1 — Upper bound: S≤M−m.
For any x1,x2∈[a,b], m≤f(xi)≤M, so
−(M−m)≤f(x1)−f(x2)≤M−m⟹∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣≤M−m.
Hence M−m is an upper bound for the set {∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣}, and by definition of supremum,
S≤M−m.(1)
Step 2 — Lower bound: S≥M−m.
Fix ε>0. By the definition of sup and inf:
- there exists x1∈[a,b] with f(x1)>M−ε/2;
- there exists x2∈[a,b] with f(x2)<m+ε/2.
Then
f(x1)−f(x2)>(M−2ε)−(m+2ε)=(M−m)−ε,
and since this is positive (assuming ε<M−m; the trivial case M=m is handled separately below),
∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣=f(x1)−f(x2)>(M−m)−ε.
Hence S≥∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣>(M−m)−ε. Since ε>0 was arbitrary,
S≥M−m.(2)
(Trivial case. If M=m then f is constant; both sides equal 0 and the statement holds trivially.)
Step 3 — Combine.
From (1) and (2),
Answer
ω(f,[a,b])=M−m=sup{∣f(x1)−f(x2)∣:x1,x2∈[a,b]}.